American coins, the overview
I love American currency. I really do. I'm not saying it's pretty — it isn't, not in the least.In the early 19th Century, it was clumsy and gauche and imitative of the continent. I like it because it tries so hard, like most of our manufactured goods back then, and never quite pulls it off. It's silly money.
In the late 19th, our drawing skills improve, but we are still under the impression that proper money has to feature some old allegorical dame or classical furniture. Lots of Liberties and ancient-Greek-looking women in indian headresses, and eagles that look more like phoenixes or Sunday dinners. Beautiful, some of it, but whimsical and surreal.
In the 20th Century, money becomes heavy, chunky, solid and serious as a heart attack. Out with the greek ladies, in with the frowning, lumpy old dead presidents. This isn't a toy, Son, this is money. This is the money that won my heart.
Anyone who's ever run a cash register will tell you that American coins hit the till with a big, satisfying chonk, and you know when I ferriner sneaks into your small change by its wussy tink. Designs elements are large and simple and bursting out of the frame.
In the 21st Century, alas, we have few skilled sculptors and no confidence in ourselves. All our new coins are poorly thought out exercises in pee cee, all our old coins are being redesigned by committee. And they're shiny. And they tink like Canuckian quarters. I'm so depressed.



We did a lot of ugly things in 1976, and an inordinate number of them were in observance of our 200th birthday. But...this thing! This horrible bicentennial quarter!
I said that because I like the way it sounds, but this is just a chronological sequence of quarters: 1968, 1988, 1998 and 2000. Can you see how the coin is changing? Yes, George's head is getting smaller and smaller. Yes, the portraiture is sucking harder by the decade. And — O yes — it's getting shinier. 
