Like this one, for instance:
The School sign. A straightforward, simple message. A job of work. A datum. No room for artistic license here. Certainly not the place for politics or polemic. Right? Hahaha! Fool!
Here's what Margaret has to say about it:
"There were pictograms of children on European signs, but they were often crudely drawn by engineers. There were some illustrated school signs in England, but they used to be of a boy of about ten with a satchel and a cap, and a small girl behind him.Inclusive. Yes, that's the word. Satchel and a cap? Intolerable symbols of class privilege. And we can't have boys leading girls 'round by the hand, now can we?"It was quite archaic, almost like an illustration from Enid Blyton, and very grammar-schooly. I wanted to make it more inclusive, because comprehensives were starting up, and I didn't want it to have a social class feel."
"I switched it to make the girl more caring, with her leading a little boy."Caring. Yes, that means "bigger and bossier."
Why am I so exercised about this? I'm not, really. Not about this one. Oh, it depresses me that there is no task so straightforward that our busybody social engineers won't use it as a teaching opportunity. It depresses me that this thing is so ubiquitous and so damn ugly. It depresses me when a job as plain and workmanlike as road signage is draped in the mantle of high art. It's positively Soviet, this slobbering over the industrial and the ordinary.
Calvert was later appointed head of graphic design at the Royal College of Art. Feh.

Friday, October 20, 2006


<< Thusly. So if you're that CSI:Miami guy — or whatever that cop show is with the dude with the sunglasses — and somebody hands you this picture and asks you to reconstruct the accident, you're going to whip off those shades and say it had to be something like this. >>